Swine Flu Scam? Ecomomic Crisis Scam? What Next? And How Afraid should we be?

Isaac Hayes - 3 May 2009

All over the world Health authorities are warning of a  swine-flu   'Armageddon'.

Maybe they are simply trying to avoid accusations of underplaying the risks, yet on the other hand, it may be that the worst is to come later this year.

What this means to the Informed Investor is absolute fear, as if the Swine flu becomes pandemic, the loss’s will be horrendous, not to mention the more important risk to life.

On June 24, 1918, the young poet  Wilfred Owen  crawled into an Army-issue bell tent at a camp in Scarborough and began composing a letter to his mother.

Owen was a 20-year-old officer in the Second Manchesters, and Owen had just been deemed fit for duty after a lengthy convalescence in Scotland following an attack of a nervous condition brought on by the stresses and strain of the war.

As Owen waited in North Yorkshire for the orders that would return him to the Front, his thoughts were on another disease entirely.

“STAND BACK FROM THE PAGE! and disinfect yourself,” he begins his letter. “Quite 1/3 of the Batt and about 30 officers are smitten with the Spanish Flu. The hospital overflowed on Friday, then the Gymnasium was filled, and now all the place seems carpeted with huddled, blanketed forms. The boys are dropping on parade like flies.”

Spanish flu so-called because Spain, not being a party to the war, was one of the few countries openly to report the spreading depredation

Owen’s remarks read like genuine alarm. But, as the next passage makes clear, Owen is being ironic and, far from taking the disinfectant measures seriously, considers the flu something of a joke, just like the entire western world today...........perception is reality...........and when the general population does not like reality, they close there eyes.

“The thing is much too common for me to take part in. I have quite decided not to! Imagine the work that falls on unaffected officers.”

Owen’s remarks will resonate with many Britons waking up today to the latest casualty count from Mexican swine flu, or H1N1.

The  NHS flu hotline  calls doubling each day, and increasingly dire predictions from the WHO about the imminence of a pandemic that could dwarf the Spanish influenza of 1918, seems to make people take no notice and turn blind.

Owen never lived to rue his words, dying at the Sambre-Oise canal in France in one of the last skirmishes of the   First World War  but within weeks of the Armistice on November 11, men who had survived the killing fields of would find themselves turning a ghastly purple color as the Spanish flu, which was also an H1N1, burrowed deep into their respiratory tract, causing their lungs to fill with choking fluids.

Between September and December of 1918, about 12,000 Londoners died in the second wave alone.

By the time the third wave of infections had subsided in May 1919, about 225,000 Britons were dead.

With half the nation’s doctors and nurses serving at the Front, and in a world without any anti virals or antibiotics, there was little anyone could do at the time except watch the dying.

“So many were ill that only the worst could be visited,” recalled a GP’s son from Lancashire. “People collapsed in their homes, in the streets and at work. All treatment was futile.”

Worldwide, the mortality from the Spanish flu, was simply inconceivable, with as many as 50 million dead according to conservative estimates.

Just how scared should we be..........well let me tell you a secret............only the paranoid survive if all this turns real!

Guardian columnist Simon Jenkins certainly was not paranoid enough when he laid into Professor John Oxford, a virologist at Barts hospital and one of the world’s foremost experts on influenza.

  Professor John Oxford  referred earlier in the week to   H1N1  as an “Armageddon sort of virus”. Scientists were “mad” to use such emotive language, Jenkins ranted, and journalists who failed to exercise judgment by quoting official government projections of as many as 94,000 London dead, were madder still.

Certainly for journalist Jenkins to discredit a Professor is more than pathetic.

Professor’s are at the fore front of the battle, and if we don’t take the words seriously , then we are in real trouble...............sure nothing might happen................but if it does we are up shit creek without a paddle.

Behind the backlash of the Professor bashers is the sense that we have been here before, in 2005 , when Prof Oxford and experts such as David Nabarro, the head of influenza planning at the   United Nations  , made similarly apocalyptic predictions about the bird-flu virus,   H5N1.  The subtext is that they cried wolf once, so why believe them now?

But just pretend for one moment that you were a Professor, and you had the most advanced technical knowledge, stuff that lame journalists would be pressed to understand, and you being a Professor could see the risk ratio clearly...........just how do you explain that to layman in the right context to explain how very very serious this could get, and yet maybe not.

We should all be on the side of caution, because this is not going to be the last of it.

Sure swine flu may pass, but just remember more dangerous variants like   SARS   are still actually out there, same as   bird Flu   and a variety of other highly dangerous variants, with the ones crossing over from birds even more dangerous that swine flu.

Just where is this all coming from, and do you really want to know.

This could shatter your entire investment portfolio, not to mention threaten your life........that's the simple reality of it, and if the investor is not willing to accept that and somewhat plan, then they will be the first to drown.

Remember   Pandemics   are the viral equivalent of the perfect storms.

In order to trigger an event on the scale of 1918, three things have to happen.

First, a new   influenza virus   one against which people have no or few antibodies has to emerge from a “hidden” animal reservoir.

Second, the virus has to make people sick. Both these conditions have already been met by the new H1N1 sub-type from Mexico.

Third thing that needs to happen is that the virus must be able to spread efficiently between people, preferably via a cough, sneeze or handshake.

Announcement the other day that a 24 year old Falkirk man, who plays on the same football team as Iain Askham, one half of the Cancún honeymoon couple who introduced the flu to Britain, has been diagnosed with the virus after a night out with Askham in the pub, the third condition has now been well fulfilled.

But this is not the only reason why England’s chief medical officer Sir Liam Donaldson is now saying we will see “many” more cases.

  Robert Madelin  , director general for EU consumer health policy, is predicting that deaths are inevitable, the only question being whether the toll will be in the “thousands, tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands”.

The root of their concern is a scientific understanding of the way that influenza viruses evolve and recombine with the genes of other viruses, including avian-flu genes.

That knowledge, for the most part, is being denied by the critics.

The main factor is that they know that it is better to be proven wrong than to be accused of failing to keep the public properly informed, as occurred during the   BSE crisis.  

Normally cautious commentators, such as Dr Alan Hay, director of the   World Influenza Centre  , are using words such as “ominous” is that the majority of the deaths recorded so far in Mexico have been in adults between the ages of 20 and 40, a mortality pattern that mirrors that of the 1918 Spanish influenza.

And similar concerns motivate Prof Oxford, who has spent most of his career studying the   Spanish influenza.  

Angus Nichol, head of the Influenza Program at the   European Centre for Disease Control  in Stockholm, informed The Independent: “Influenza viruses are very slippery creatures. The relatively few deaths we have seen so far could be the tip of the iceberg.”

In 2005, I came face-to-face with what was then also being billed as an  “Armageddon”   strain when I travelled to Vietnam.

In 2005 in an isolation ward at Hanoi’s Bach Mai hospital, doctors struggled to ventilate a young man who had caught the H5N1 virus after slaughtering an infected duck for a family meal. Pencil-thin and breathing heavily, Sy Tuan drifted in and out of delirium, gasping for air. He had waited too long to seek treatment, and the virus had burrowed deep into his lungs, sparking an auto-immune reaction.

Dr Nguyen Tuong Van, the director of Bach Mai’s intensive care unit showed Sy Tuan’s chest X-rays. There were white shadows everywhere. It was like looking at a patient with advanced tuberculosis.

Sy Tuan survived and, though there have been subsequent human H5N1 infections, H5N1 never became a “super spreader”.

Since the current outbreak began in 2003, there have been only 421 cases and 257 deaths, the majority in south-east Asia.

But by contrast, the Mexican H1N1 subtype has already infected about 3,000 people and been reported on every continent on the world globe.

It is far too early to say how or where the critical mutations occurred. Some newspaper reports have pointed the finger at a pig farming facility near La Gloria, in Veracruz, operated by the US company Smithfield, the world’s biggest pork processor.

At La Gloria, about 12 miles from the farm, on April 2, a five year old boy, Edgar Hernandez, became ill with what the Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta has since confirmed as the first human infection with the swine flu.

However, other reports suggest that the index case may have been a census-taker from Oaxaca, who lived nowhere near the pig farm where is the truth?

What cannot be denied is that Mexican H1N1 is primarily a pig flu and a dangerous one at that: what is known in the trade as a “quadruple reassortment”, consisting of two swine flu strains, one human strain, and an unidentified avian strain.

According to preliminary analysis from human cases in California and Texas, six of the eight viral segments are closely related to a North American swine flu strain that emerged in 1998, killing hundreds of sows at a pig breeding facility in North Carolina.

The most worrying parallels, however, are historical. Although the 1918 pandemic was blamed on the   Iberians  , “Spanish” influenza is a misnomer.

By chance then, as now, the earliest reported case came from the Americas, from Haskell County, Kansas, where    doughboys   at a US army base were being fattened on chickens and pork grown on local farms before being marched on to transports to join Wilfred Owen in northern France.

Also then and as now, the first cases occurred in the spring, a highly unusual time of year for an outbreak in the northern hemisphere.

The last observation is particularly worrying and explains why scientists have been advising governments to activate their pandemic plans now, rather than waiting for the   WHO   to declare a level-six alert the formal signal that a pandemic has started.

It can be argued that, if the current outbreak is mirroring the 1918 pandemic, then we should expect the first wave to be mild.

It is when Mexican H1N1 returns in the autumn that we could see a sudden ratcheting up of its virulence and a spike in mortality, as occurred in 1918.

Questions may soon be answered by genomic analysis already underway at the CDC in Atlanta.

When epidemiologists have a better idea on the true level of infections in Mexico and whether the deaths reported so far are due to H1N1 and not some other strain of flu, or even bacterial pneumonias, we will also be in a better position to gauge the attack rate and in which direction the virus is evolving.

There is even a possibility that Mexican H1N1 could recombine with H5N1when it reaches south-east Asia, thus becoming both highly transmissible and highly pathogenic, a combination that surely would be a formula for the greatest ever “Armageddon”.

In 1918, Britain’s medical authorities buried their heads in the sand as some are now, reasoning that there was little doctors could do to prevent influenza or to treat it and that, besides, the needs of war dictated the nation “carry on” as usual.

In this modern day we do not enjoy the bliss of ignorance, and those that ignore it should have there heads read, although it wont really matter much anymore when the ignorant are face with possibly death on a massive scale.

Mr Mark Honigsbaum is a researcher at the   Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine   at UCL, and the author of Living With Enza: The Forgotten Story of Britain and the Great Flu Pandemic of 1918, a book which should be read.

As for investment...........good luck.............we here at Hardcore Investments believe that if this is the real deal now, or maybe later, that only the most astute investors will survive, but we leave you with this thought – the prelude to the Spanish Flu was World War 1, and then came World War 2, but if this turns into Spanish Flu No.2 we may well see a new kind of War.

Mark To Market